Skip to main content

Selecting a Quality Journal: Predatory Publishing Bibliography

Predatory Publishing Reading list

 

Adnan, A., Anwar, S., Zia, T., Razzaq, S., Maqbool, F., & Rehman, Z. U. (2018). Beyond Beall’s Blacklist: Automatic Detection of Open Access Predatory Research Journals. 2018 IEEE 20th International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications; IEEE 16th International Conference on Smart City; IEEE 4th International Conference on Data Science and Systems (HPCC/SmartCity/DSS) (pp. 1692–1697). Retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8623012

Aguzzi, A. (2019). ‘Broken access’ publishing corrodes quality. Nature, 570(7760), 139–139. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01787-2

Ajuwon, G. A., & Ajuwon, A. J. (2018). Predatory publishing and the dilemma of the Nigerian academic. African Journal of Biomedical Research, 21(1), 1–5. Retrieved from https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajbr/article/view/165957

Al-Khatib, A. (2016). Protecting Authors from Predatory Journals and Publishers. Publishing Research Quarterly, 32(4), 281–285. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12109-016-9474-3

Al-Khatib, A., & Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2017). Threats to the Survival of the Author-Pays-Journal to Publish Model. Publishing Research Quarterly, 33(1), 64–70. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12109-016-9486-z

Allen, M. (2018). Beware the Predatory Journal: It’s Not Just Fieldwork That Is Dangerous. SAA Archaeological Record, (May). Retrieved from http://onlinedigeditions.com/publication/?i=496953&article_id=3089134&view=articleBrowser&ver=html5#%7B%22issue_id%22:496953,%22view%22:%22articleBrowser%22,%22article_id%22:%223089134%22%7D

Allman, D. (2019). Pseudo or perish: problematizing the ‘predatory’ in global health publishing. Critical Public Health, 29(4), 413–423. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09581596.2019.1606417

Almutairi, A. F., & Salam, M. (2017). A snapshot of current medical research: The notion of supply and demand. Curr Pediatr Res, 21(4), 546–547. Retrieved from http://www.alliedacademies.org/articles/a-snapshot-of-current-medical-research-the-notion-of-supply-and-demand-8289.html

Alrawadieh, Z. (2018). Publishing in predatory tourism and hospitality journals: Mapping the academic market and identifying response strategies. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 1–10. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1467358418800121

AlRyalat, S. A., Farah, R. I., Shehadeh, B., Abukeshek, A., Aldabbas, L., Al-fawair, A., & Ababneh, O. (2019). Biomedical researchers and students knowledge about predatory journals. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 45(5), 102056. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2019.102056

AMWA–EMWA–ISMPP joint position statement on predatory publishing. (2019). Current Medical Research and Opinion, 35(9), 1657–1658. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03007995.2019.1646535

Andoohgin Shahri, M., Jazi, M. D., Borchardt, G., & Dadkhah, M. (2017). Detecting Hijacked Journals by Using Classification Algorithms. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1–14. Springer Netherlands. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11948-017-9914-2

Aponte, J. (2018). Predatory Publishing and Organizers: What Scholars in Academia need to know. Hispanic Health Care International, 16(2), 54–55. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1540415318790704

Asadi, A. (2018). Invitation to Speak at a Conference: The Tempting Technique Adopted by Predatory Conferences’ Organizers. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1–5. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11948-018-0038-0

Asadi, A., Rahbar, N., Asadi, M., Asadi, F., & Khalili Paji, K. (2017). Online-Based Approaches to Identify Real Journals and Publishers from Hijacked Ones. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(1), 305–308. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11948-015-9747-9

Atiso, K., Kammer, J., & Bossaller, J. (2019). Predatory publishing and the Ghana experience: A call to action for information professionals. IFLA Journal, 1–12. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0340035219868816

Ayeni, P. O., & Adetoro, N. (2017). Growth of predatory open access journals: implication for quality assurance in library and information science research. Library Hi Tech News, 34(1), 17–22. Retrieved from http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/LHTN-10-2016-0046

Babor, T. F., & Ward, J. H. (2018). Caveat emptor: Predatory publishers, rogue journals, and the potential corruption of addiction science. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 79(4), 509–513. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30079864

Bagues, M., Sylos-Labini, M., & Zinovyeva, N. (2019). A walk on the wild side: ‘Predatory’ journals and information asymmetries in scientific evaluations. Research Policy, 48(2), 462–477. Retrieved from www.iza.org

Baker, E. F., Iserson, K. V., Aswegan, A. L., Larkin, G. L., Derse, A. R., & Kraus, C. K. (2019). Open Access Medical Journals. Academic Medicine, 94(5), 634–639. Retrieved from http://insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=00001888-201905000-00026

Balehegn, M. (2017). Increased Publication in Predatory Journals by Developing Countries’ Institutions: What It Entails? And What Can Be Done? International Information and Library Review, 49(2), 97–100. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2016.1278188

Barroga, E. (2015). Predatory publishing practices corrode the credibility of science. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 30(10), 1535–1536. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26425055

Bartholomew, R. E. (2014). Science for sale: the rise of predatory journals. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 107(10), 384–385. Retrieved from http://jrs.sagepub.com/lookup/doi/10.1177/0141076814548526

Beall, J. (2013a). Criteria for Determining Predatory Open-Access Publishers. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699. Retrieved from https://beallslist.weebly.com/uploads/3/0/9/5/30958339/criteria-2015.pdf

Beall, J. (2013b). The open-access movement is not really about open access. TripleC, 11(2), 589–597. Retrieved from https://triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/525

Beall, J. (2013c). Five Predatory Mega-Journals: A Review. The Charleston Advisor, 14(4), 20–25. Retrieved from http://openurl.ingenta.com/content/xref?genre=article&issn=1525-4011&volume=14&issue=4&spage=20

Beall, J. (2013d). Predatory publishing is just one of the consequences of gold open access. Learned Publishing, 26(2), 79–84. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1087/20130203

Beall, J. (2015a). The “Metric” System: Yet More Chaos in Scholarly Publishing. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 6(11), 2020–2021. Retrieved from http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00910%5Cnpapers3://publication/doi/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00910

Beall, J. (2015b). Predatory journals and the breakdown of research cultures. Information Development, 31(5), 473–476. Retrieved from http://idv.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0266666915601421

Beall, J. (2016a). Best practices for scholarly authors in the age of predatory journals. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 98(2), 77–79. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26829665

Beall, J. (2016b). Dangerous predatory publishers threaten medical research. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 31(10), 1511–1513. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27550476

Beall, J. (2016c). Predatory journals: Ban predators from the scientific record. Nature, 534(7607), 326. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/534326a

Beall, J. (2016d). Medical publishing and the threat of predatory journals. International Journal of Women’s Dermatology, 2(4), 115–116. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5418893/

Beall, J. (2016e). Essential Information about Predatory Publishers and Journals. International Higher Education, 86, 2–3. Retrieved from https://ejournals.bc.edu/index.php/ihe/article/view/9358

Beall, J. (2017a). Predatory journals, peer review, and education research. New Horizons in Adult Education & Human Resource Development, 29(1), 54–58. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/nha3.20173

Beall, J. (2017b). What I learned from predatory publishers. Biochemia Medica, 27(2), 273–278. Retrieved from http://www.biochemia-medica.com/system/files/27_2_J.Beall__What

Beaubien, S., & Eckard, M. (2014). Addressing Faculty Publishing Concerns with Open Access Journal Quality Indicators. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 2(2), eP1133. Retrieved from http://jlsc-pub.org/jlsc/vol2/iss2/8

Bell, K. (2017). ‘Predatory’’ open access journals as parody: Exposing the limitations of “legitimate’’ academic publishing.”’ TripleC, 15(2), 651–662. Retrieved from https://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/870

Beninger, P. G., Beall, J., & Shumway, S. E. (2016). Debasing the Currency of Science: The Growing Menace of Predatory Open Access Journals. Journal of Shellfish Research, 35(1), 1–5. Retrieved from http://www.bioone.org/doi/10.2983/035.035.0101

Berger, M. (2017). Everything You Ever Wanted To Know about predatory publishing But Were Afraid to Ask. ACRL (pp. 206–217). Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/conferences/confsandpreconfs/2017/EverythingYouEverWantedtoKnowAboutPredatoryPublishing.pdf

Berger, M., & Cirasella, J. (2015). Beyond Beall’s List Better understanding predatory publishers. College & Research Libraries News, 76(3), 132–135. Retrieved from http://crln.acrl.org/content/76/3/132.full

Beshyah, S. (2018). Awareness of Predatory Journals among Physicians from Africa and the Middle East: An Exploratory Survey. Ibnosina Journal of Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, 10(4), 136–139. Retrieved from http://10.0.16.7/ijmbs.ijmbs_10_17%0Ahttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=125015780&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Beshyah, S. A. (2017). Predatory Publishing: A Wake-up Call for Editors and Authors in the Middle East and Africa. Ibnosina Journal of Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, 9(5), 123–125. Retrieved from http://10.0.16.7/ijmbs.ijmbs_26_17%0Ahttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=125015776&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Betz, C. L. (2016). Authors Beware: Open Access Predatory Journals. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 31(3), 233–234. Elsevier Inc. Retrieved from http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S088259631600052X

Bisaccio, M. (2018). Cabells’ Journal Whitelist and Blacklist: Intelligent data for informed journal evaluations. Learned Publishing, 31(3), 243–248. Retrieved from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/leap.1164

Björk, B.-C. (2015). Have the “mega-journals” reached the limits to growth? PeerJ, 3, e981. Retrieved from https://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.981%5Cnhttps://peerj.com/articles/981

Björk, B.-C. (2017). Open access to scientific articles: a review of benefits and challenges. Internal and Emergency Medicine, 12(2), 247–253. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11739-017-1603-2

Björk, B. C., & Solomon, D. (2015). Article processing charges in OA journals: relationship between price and quality. Scientometrics, 103(2), 373–385. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-015-1556-z

Bohannon, J. (2013). Who’s Afraid of Peer Review? Science, 342(6154), 60–65. Retrieved from http://www.sciencemag.org/lookup/doi/10.1126/science.342.6154.60

Bohannon, J. (2015). How to hijack a journal. Science, 350(6263), 903–905. Retrieved from http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/doi/10.1126/science.350.6263.897

Bolshete, P. (2018). Analysis of thirteen predatory publishers: a trap for eager-to-publish researchers. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 34(1), 157–162. Taylor & Francis. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2017.1358160

Bornemann, E. (2013). Exposing predatory publishers. Information Today, 30(6), 13. Retrieved from https://www.questia.com/magazine/1G1-333742444/exposing-predatory-publishers

Bourgault, A. M. (2019). Predatory Journals: A Potential Threat to Nursing Practice and Science. Critical Care Nurse, 39(4), 9–11. Retrieved from http://ccn.aacnjournals.org/lookup/doi/10.4037/ccn2019529

Bowman, D. E., & Wallace, M. B. (2018). Predatory journals: a serious complication in the scholarly publishing landscape. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 87(1), 273–274. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2017.09.019

Bowman, J. D. (2014). Predatory Publishing, Questionable Peer Review, and Fraudulent Conferences. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 78(10), 1–6. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4315198/

Bowman, M. A., Saultz, J. W., & Phillips, W. R. (2018). Beware of Predatory Journals: A Caution from Editors of Three Family Medicine Journals. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 31(5), 671–676. Retrieved from http://www.jabfm.org/lookup/doi/10.3122/jabfm.2018.05.180197

Braverman, M. T. (2018). The Evolving Landscape of Academic Publishing: Essential Knowledge for Extension Scholars. Journal of Extension, 56(3). Retrieved from https://www.joe.org/joe/2018june/tt1.php

Broome, M. E. (2017). Predatory publishing is everyone’s concern. Nursing Outlook, 65(6), 667–668. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2017.10.003

Bucchi, M. (2017). Credibility, expertise and the challenges of science communication 2.0. Public Understanding of Science, 26(8), 890–893. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0963662517733368

Butler-Adam, J. (2014). Dealing with ‘open access’’ demons.’ South African Journal of Science, 110(5/6), 1. Retrieved from http://www.sajs.co.za/dealing-‘open-access’-demons/john-butler-adam

Butler, D. (2013). The Dark Side of Publishing. Nature, 495(3), 433–435. Retrieved from http://www.iiserpune.ac.in/%7B~%7Dcathale/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/butler2013darkside-ScientificPublishing.pdf

Byard, R. W. (2016). The forensic implications of predatory publishing. Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology, 12(4), 391–393. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12024-016-9771-3

Camacho, M., & Reckley, L. K. (2018). Predatory journals: Enough is enough. The Laryngoscope, 128(7), 1510–1510. Retrieved from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/lary.27178

Cappell, M. S. (2015). List predatory journal publications separately from genuine scholarly publications as standard for CVs. BMJ, 350(may14 11), h2470--h2470. Retrieved from http://www.bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/bmj.h2470

Chambers, A. H. (2019). How I became easy prey. Science, 364(6440), 602–602. Retrieved from http://www.sciencemag.org/lookup/doi/10.1126/science.364.6440.602

Chandrakumar, A., ‘t Jong, G. W., & Klassen, T. P. (2018). The Role of Mainstream Publishers in Eliminating the Threat of Predatory Publishing. Canadian Journal of Diabetes, 42(5), 457–458. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjd.2018.08.198

Christopher, M. M., & Young, K. M. (2015). Awareness of “Predatory” Open-Access Journals among Prospective Veterinary and Medical Authors Attending Scientific Writing Workshops. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 2(August), 1–11. Retrieved from http://journal.frontiersin.org/Article/10.3389/fvets.2015.00022/abstract

Clark:, J., & Clark, J. (2015). How to avoid predatory journals—a five point plan. The BMJ Blogs, 1–9. Retrieved from http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2015/01/19/jocalyn-clark-how-to-avoid-predatory-journals-a-five-point-plan/

Clark, A. M., & Thompson, D. R. (2017). Five (bad) reasons to publish your research in predatory journals. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 73(11), 2499–2501. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27486055

Clark, J., & Smith, R. (2015). Firm action needed on predatory journals. Bmj, 350(jan16 1), h210--h210. Retrieved from http://www.bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/bmj.h210

Clements, J. C., Daigle, R. M., & Froehlich, H. E. (2018). Predator in the Pool? A Quantitative Evaluation of Non-indexed Open Access Journals in Aquaculture Research. Frontiers in Marine Science, 5(March), 1–14. Retrieved from http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmars.2018.00106/full

Clemons, M., de Costa e Silva, M., Joy, A. A., Cobey, K. D., Mazzarello, S., Stober, C., & Hutton, B. (2017). Predatory Invitations from Journals: More Than Just a Nuisance? The Oncologist, 22(2), 236–240. Retrieved from http://theoncologist.alphamedpress.org/lookup/doi/10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0371

Cobey, K. D., Grudniewicz, A., Lalu, M. M., Rice, D. B., Raffoul, H., & Moher, D. (2019). Knowledge and motivations of researchers publishing in presumed predatory journals: A survey. BMJ Open, 9(3), 1–9. Retrieved from http://bmjopen.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026516

Cobey, K. D., Lalu, M. M., Skidmore, B., Ahmadzai, N., Grudniewicz, A., & Moher, D. (2018). What is a predatory journal? A scoping review. F1000Research, 7(2), 1001. Retrieved from https://f1000research.com/articles/7-1001/v1

Cohen, A. J., Patino, G., Kamal, P., Ndoye, M., Tresh, A., Mena, J., Butler, C., et al. (2019). Perspectives From Authors and Editors in the Biomedical Disciplines on Predatory Journals: Survey Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(8), e13769. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31471960

Commercial Academic Publishing Preying on Taiwan. (2019). CommonWealth Magazine, 669, 1–16. Retrieved from https://english.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=2346

Cordeiro, Y. (2017). Publish and perish in the hands of predatory journals. Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences, 89(2), 787–788. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652017000300787

Cortegiani, A., Longhini, F., Sanfilippo, F., Raineri, S. M., Gregoretti, C., & Giarratano, A. (2019). Predatory open-access publishing in anesthesiology. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 128(1), 182–187. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30234529

Cortegiani, A., Sanfilippo, F., Tramarin, J., & Giarratano, A. (2019). Predatory open-access publishing in critical care medicine. Journal of Critical Care, 50, 247–249. Retrieved from https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0883944118314941

Cortegiani, A., & Shafer, S. L. (2018). “Think. Check. Submit.” to avoid predatory publishing. Critical Care, 22(1), 300. Retrieved from https://ccforum.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13054-018-2244-1

Cress, P. E., & Sarwer, D. B. (2019). Predatory Journals: An Ethical Crisis in Publishing. Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum, 1(1), 1–3. Retrieved from https://academic.oup.com/asjopenforum/article/doi/10.1093/asjof/ojz001/5366231

Cuschieri, S., & Grech, V. (2018). WASP (Write a Scientific Paper): Open access unsolicited emails for scholarly work – Young and senior researchers perspectives. Early Human Development, 122, 64–66. Retrieved from https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378378218302421

Cyranoski, D. (2018). China introduces sweeping reforms against misconduct. Nature, 558, 8. Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-05359-8

Dadkhah, Medhi, & Stefanutti, C. (2015). Hijacked journals are emerging as a challenge for scholarly publishing |. Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej, 125(10), 783–784. Retrieved from http://pamw.pl/en/issue/article/26529339

Dadkhah, Mehdi. (2016a). Types of hijacking in the academic world – our experiment in the scholarly publishing. Library Hi Tech News, 33(3), 1–2. Retrieved from http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/LHTN-09-2015-0065

Dadkhah, Mehdi. (2016b). Researchers Must Not Use Phrases in Search Engines to Find Journals. Journal of the Association for Vascular Access, 21(1), 19–20. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.java.2015.11.001

Dadkhah, Mehdi, & Bianciardi, G. (2016). Ranking Predatory Journals: Solve the Problem Instead of Removing It! Advanced Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 6(1), 1–4. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4845555/

Dadkhah, Mehdi, & Borchardt, G. (2016). Hijacked Journals: An Emerging Challenge for Scholarly Publishing. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 36(6), 739–741. Retrieved from https://academic.oup.com/asj/article/36/6/739/2664479

Dadkhah, Mehdi, Borchardt, G., Lagzian, M., & Bianciardi, G. (2017). Academic Journals Plagued by Bogus Impact Factors. Publishing Research Quarterly, 33(2), 183–187. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12109-017-9509-4

Dadkhah, Mehdi, Jazi, M. D., & Pacukaj, S. (2015). Fake Conferences for Earning Real Money. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 11–12. Retrieved from http://www.mcser.org/journal/index.php/mjss/article/view/5778

Dadkhah, Mehdi, Lagzian, M., & Borchardt, G. (2017). Questionable papers in citation databases as an issue for literature review. Journal of Cell Communication and Signaling, 11(2), 181–185. Journal of Cell Communication and Signaling. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12079-016-0370-6

Dadkhah, Mehdi, & Maliszewski, T. (2015). Hijacked journals – threats and challenges to countries’ scientific ranking. Int. J. Technology Enhanced Learning, 7(3), 281–288. Retrieved from https://www.inderscience.com/info/inarticle.php?artid=72819

Dadkhah, Mehdi, Maliszewski, T., & Jazi, M. D. (2016). Characteristics of Hijacked Journals and Predatory Publishers: Our Observations in the Academic World. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 37(6), 415–418. Retrieved from http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0165614716300037

Dadkhah, Mehdi, Maliszewski, T., & Lyashenko, V. V. (2016). An approach for preventing the indexing of hijacked journal articles in scientific databases. Behaviour & Information Technology, 3001(February), 1–6. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0144929X.2015.1128975

Dadkhah, Mehdi, Maliszewski, T., & Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2016). Hijacked journals, hijacked web-sites, journal phishing, misleading metrics, and predatory publishing: actual and potential threats to academic integrity and publishing ethics. Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology, 12(3), 353–362. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12024-016-9785-x

Dadkhah, Mehdi, Obeidat, M. M., & Jazi, M. D. (2015). How Can We Identify Hijacked Journals? Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 4(2), 83–87. Retrieved from http://journal.portalgaruda.org/index.php/EEI/article/view/449

Dadkhah, Mehdi, & Quliyeva, A. (2014). Social engineering in academic world. Journal of Contemporary Applied Mathematics, 4(2), 2014–2016. Retrieved from http://journalcam.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/1.pdf

Dadkhah, Mehdi, Seno, S. A. H., & Borchardt, G. (2017). Current and potential cyber attacks on medical journals; guidelines for improving security. European Journal of Internal Medicine, 38, 25–29. European Federation of Internal Medicine. Retrieved from http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0953620516304113

Dadkhah, Mehdi, Shyam, A. K., Bagdassarian, V. C., & Jazi, M. D. (2016). Similar names in academic literature as a tools to deceive researchers. International Journal of Advanced Intelligence Paradigms, 8(1), 119. Retrieved from http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=74780

Dal-Ré, R., & Marušić, A. (2019). Potential predatory journals are colonizing the ICMJE recommendations list of followers. Netherlands Journal of Medicine. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30895939

Danevska, L., Spiroski, M., Donev, D., Pop-Jordanova, N., & Polenakovic, M. (2016). How to Recognize and Avoid Potential, Possible, or Probable Predatory Open-Access Publishers, Standalone, and Hijacked Journals. PRILOZI, 37(2–3), 5–13. Retrieved from http://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/prilozi/37/2-3/article-p5.xml

Darbyshire, P. (2018). Fake news. Fake journals. Fake conferences. What we can do. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(9–10), 1727–1729. Retrieved from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/jocn.14214

Demir, S. B. (2018a). Scholarly databases under scrutiny. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 73(2017), 096100061878415. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0961000618784159

Demir, S. B. (2018b). Predatory journals: Who publishes in them and why? Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1296–1311. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.10.008

Djuric, D. (2014). Penetrating the Omerta of Predatory Publishing: The Romanian Connection. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(2015), 1–20. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11948-014-9521-4

Drake, P. P. (2019). Predatory Journals, Open-Access, and the Effect on Publishing in Finance. SSRN Electronic Journal, (January). Retrieved from https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=3314970

Drugaş, M. (2015). Predatory Publishing and the Psychology Behind it. Psychological Thought, 8(1), 1–6. Retrieved from http://psyct.psychopen.eu/article/view/136/html

Ebadi, S., & Zamani, G. (2018). Predatory publishing as a case of symbolic violence: A critical English for academic purposes approach. (M. Popescu, Ed.)Cogent Education, 5(1), 1–25. Cogent. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1501889

Edie, A. H., & Conklin, J. L. (2019). Avoiding predatory journals: Quick peer review processes too good to be true. Nursing Forum, (January), 1–4. Retrieved from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/nuf.12333

El-Azhary, R. (2017). Predatory journals: will they survive or thrive? International Journal of Dermatology, 56(7), 797. Retrieved from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/ijd.13649

Erdag, T. K. (2019). Boring emails: “You are invited to submit a manuscript for ….” Turk Otolarengoloji Arsivi/Turkish Archives of Otolaryngology, 56(4), 185–187. Retrieved from http://www.turkarchotolaryngol.net/eng/makale/750/79/Full-Text

Erfanmanesh, M., & Pourhossein, R. (2017). Publishing in Predatory Open Access Journals: A Case of Iran. Publishing Research Quarterly, 33(4), 433–444. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12109-017-9547-y

Eriksson, S., & Helgesson, G. (2017). The false academy: predatory publishing in science and bioethics. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 20(2), 163–170. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11019-016-9740-3

Eriksson, S., & Helgesson, G. (2018). Time to stop talking about ‘predatory journals’’.’ Learned Publishing, 31(2), 181–183. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/leap.1135

Eve, M. P., & Priego, E. (2017). Who is Actually Harmed by Predatory Publishers? tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 15(2), 755–770. Retrieved from http://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/867

Eykens, J., Guns, R., Engels, T. C. E., Wetenschappen, F. S., & Antwerpen, U. (2018). Comparing VABB-SHW (version VIII) with Cabells Journal Blacklist and Directory of Open Access Journals, (January). Retrieved from https://repository.uantwerpen.be/docman/irua/8cd8d5/157109.pdf

Eykens, J., Guns, R., Rahman, A. I. M. J., Sīle, L., & Engels, T. C. E. (2018). Predatory Open Access journals: A review of past screenings within the Flemish performance based research funding system (2014 – 2018). STI 2018 Conference Proceedings: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (pp. 799–806). Retrieved from http://eprints.rclis.org/33462/

Ferris, L. E., & Winker, M. A. (2017). Ethical issues in publishing in predatory journals. Biochemia Medica, 27(2), 279–284. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5493173/

Fiala, C., Lim, B., & Diamandis, E. P. (2019). The growing problem of predatory publishing: a case report. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), 0(0), 7–9. Retrieved from http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/cclm.ahead-of-print/cclm-2019-0798/cclm-2019-0798.xml

Fiebert, M. S. (2014). A Look At Open Access Publication and Beall’S List of “Predatory” Journals. Global Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 3(4), 5–6. Retrieved from http://www.gifre.org/admin/papers/gjiss/5-6-PUBLICATION-vol-3-4-gjiss.pdf

Florczak, K. L. (2018). Prevent Betrayal by Predatory Publishers: Trust But Verify. Nursing Science Quarterly, 31(1), 11–14. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0894318417741100

Forero, D. A., Oermann, M. H., Manca, A., Deriu, F., Mendieta-Zerón, H., Dadkhah, M., Bhad, R., et al. (2018). Negative Effects of “Predatory” Journals on Global Health Research. Annals of Global Health, 84(4), 584–589. Retrieved from https://annalsofglobalhealth.org/article/10.29024/aogh.2389/

Frandsen, T. F. (2017). Are predatory journals undermining the credibility of science? A bibliometric analysis of citers. Scientometrics, 1–16. Springer Netherlands. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-017-2520-x

Frandsen, T. F. (2019a). How can a questionable journal be identified: Frameworks and checklists. Learned Publishing, 32(3), 1–6. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/leap.1230

Frandsen, T. F. (2019b). Why do researchers decide to publish in questionable journals? A review of the literature. Learned Publishing, 32(1), 57–62. Retrieved from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/leap.1214

Frantsvåg, J. E. (2019). The DOAJ Spring Cleaning 2016 and What Was Removed—Tragic Loss or Good Riddance? Publications, 7(3), 45. Retrieved from https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/7/3/45

Gasparyan, A. Y. (2013). Choosing the Target Journal: Do Authors Need a Comprehensive Approach? Journal of Korean Medical Science, 28(8), 1117. Retrieved from https://synapse.koreamed.org/DOIx.php?id=10.3346/jkms.2013.28.8.1117

Gasparyan, A. Y., Nurmashev, B., Udovik, E. E., Koroleva, A. M., & Kitas, G. D. (2017). Predatory Publishing Is a Threat to Non-Mainstream Science. J Korean Med Sci, 32(6), 713–717. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28378542

Gasparyan, A. Y., Nurmashev, B., Voronov, A. A., Gerasimov, A. N., Koroleva, A. M., & Kitas, G. D. (2016). The pressure to publish more and the scope of predatory publishing activities. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 31(12), 1874–1878. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27822923

Gasparyan, A. Y., Yessirkepov, M., Diyanova, S. N., & Kitas, G. D. (2015). Publishing ethics and predatory practices: A dilemma for all stakeholders of science communication. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 30(8), 1010–1016. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26240476

Gillis, A. (2019). The Rise of Junk Science Fake publications are corrupting the world of research — and influencing real news. The Walrus. Retrieved from https://thewalrus.ca/the-rise-of-junk-science/

Gonzalez, J., Bridgeman, M. B., & Hermes-DeSantis, E. R. (2017). Differentiating predatory scholarship: best practices in scholarly publication. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice. Retrieved from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/ijpp.12380

Grey, A., Bolland, M. J., Dalbeth, N., Gamble, G., & Sadler, L. (2016). We read spam a lot: prospective cohort study of unsolicited and unwanted academic invitations. BMJ, 355(i5383), 1–4. Retrieved from http://www.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmj.i5383

Grzybowski, A., & Patryn Rafałand Sak, J. (2017). Predatory journals and dishonesty in science. Clinics in Dermatology, 35(6), 607–610. Retrieved from http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0738081X17301190

Gutierrez, F. R. S., Beall, J., & Forero, D. A. (2015). Spurious alternative impact factors: The scale of the problem from an academic perspective. BioEssays, 37(5), 474–476. Retrieved from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/bies.201500011

Habibzadeh, F., & Simundic, A.-M. (2017). Predatory journals and their effects on scientific research community. Biochemia Medica, 27(2), 270–272. Retrieved from http://www.biochemia-medica.com/system/files/27_2_F.Habibzadeh et al._Predatory journals and their effects on.pdf

Hanscheid, T., Hardisty, D. W., & Henriques, S. O. (2018). The Crisis in Scientific Publishing: A Holistic Perspective About Background Issues Associated with Predatory Publishing. Acta Médica Portuguesa, 31(10), 524. Retrieved from https://actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10762

Hansoti, B., Langdorf, M., & Murphy, L. (2016). Discriminating Between Legitimate and Predatory Open Access Journals: Report from the International Federation for Emergency Medicine Research Committee. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 17(5), 497–507. Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/64f3v9fj

Harvey, H. B., & Weinstein, D. F. (2017). Predatory publishing: An emerging threat to the medical literature. Academic Medicine, 92(2), 150–151. Retrieved from https://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/Fulltext/2017/02000/Predatory_Publishing__An_Emerging_Threat_to_the.13.aspx

Hasan, Z. (2018). Academic sociology The alarming rise in predatory publishing and its consequences for Islamic economics and finance. ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, 10(1), 6–18. Retrieved from https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/IJIF-11-2017-0044

Hedding, D. W. (2019). Payouts push professors towards predatory journals. Nature, 565(7739), 267. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-00120-1

Hemmat Esfe, M., Wongwises, S., Asadi, A., & Akbari, M. (2014). Fake Journals: Their Features and Some Viable Ways to Distinguishing Them. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(4), 821–824. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11948-014-9595-z

Heneberg, P. (2019). The troubles of high-profile open access megajournals. Scientometrics, 120(2), 733–746. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03144-6

Herron, J. (2017). Predatory Publishers. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 14(1), 27–31. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15424065.2017.1281191

van der Heyden, M. A. G., & van Veen, T. A. B. (2018). Gold open access: the best of both worlds. Netherlands Heart Journal, 26(1), 3–4. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12471-017-1064-2

Hill, T. (2015). Identifying legitimate open access journals: some suggestions from a publisher. Learned Publishing, 28(1), 59–62. Retrieved from http://openurl.ingenta.com/content/xref?genre=article&issn=0953-1513&volume=28&issue=1&spage=59

Hoffecker, L. (2018). Resource review. Cabells Scholarly Analytics. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106(2), 270–272. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5886516/

Houghton, F., & Houghton, S. (2018). “Blacklists” and “whitelists”: a salutary warning concerning the prevalence of racist language in discussions of predatory publishing. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106(4), 527–530. Retrieved from http://jmla.pitt.edu/ojs/jmla/article/view/490

Hua, F., Shen, C., Walsh, T., Glenny, A.-M. M., & Worthington, H. (2017). Open Access: Concepts, findings, and recommendations for stakeholders in dentistry. Journal of Dentistry, 64(June), 13–22. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300571217301574

Huffman, J. (2017). Publisher Package and Open Access Journals: Are Any of Them Predatory? The Serials Librarian, 73(3–4), 248–268. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0361526X.2017.1389796

Hvistendahl, M. (2013). China ’ s Publication Bazaar. Science, 342(November), 1035–1039. Retrieved from https://science.sciencemag.org/content/342/6162/1035

Ibba, S., Pani, F. E., Stockton, J. G., Barabino, G., Marchesi, M., & Tigano, D. (2017). Incidence of predatory journals in computer science literature. Library Review, 66(6/7), 505–522. Retrieved from http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/LR-12-2016-0108

Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2014). How to Make More Published Research True. PLoS Medicine, 11(10), e1001747. Retrieved from https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001747

Ioannidis, J. P. A., Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. W. (2018). Thousands of scientists publish a paper every five days. Nature, 561(7722), 167–169. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-06185-8

Iyengar, M. (2018). Selection of good medical journals for publication - an innovative approach. Indian J Comm Health., 30(2), 170–173. Retrieved from http://www.iapsmupuk.org/journal/index.php/IJCH/article/view/843

de Jager, P., van der Spuy, P., & de Kock, F. (2016). Do Not Feed the Predators. SSRN Electronic Journal, 48(3), 35–45. Retrieved from https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=2858750

Jain, S., & Jain, H. (2017). Predatory journals: some alternatives. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 26(January 2017), 123. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2017.01.024

Jakhar, D., & Kaur, I. (2019). Predatory Conferences: A flimflam academic deception. Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, 14020. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31162846

Jalalian, M. (2014a). Hijacked journal list: list of hijacked journals and fake publishers. Publication Ethics Report, (June), 1–3. Retrieved from http://www.mehrdadjalalian.com/1.pdf

Jalalian, M. (2014b). Hijacked journals are attacking the reliability and validity of medical research. Electronic physician, 6(4), 925–926. Retrieved from http://www.americanbanker.com/issues/179_124/which-city-is-the-next-big-fintech-hub-new-york-stakes-its-claim-1068345-1.html

Jalalian, M., & Dadkhah, M. (2015). The full story of 90 hijacked journals from August 2011 to June 2015. Geographica Pannonica, 19(2), 73–87. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279232562_The_full_story_of_90_hijacked_journals_from_August_2011_to_June_2015

Jalalian, M., & Mahboobi, H. (2013). New corruption detected: Bogus impact factors compiled by fake organizations. Electronic physician, 5(3), 685–686. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4477750/

Jalalian, M., & Mahboobi, H. (2014). Hijacked journals and predatory publishers: Is there a need to re-think how to assess the quality of academic research? Walailak Journal of Science and Technology, 11(5), 389–394. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Hijacked-Journals-and-Predatory-Publishers%3A-Is-a-to-Jalalian-Mahboobi/800d25d4acd8fb49cef5bd8aad4fa5cf9958e0ed

Jimenez, D. F., & Garza, D. N. (2017). Predatory Publishing and Academic Integrity. World Neurosurgery, 105, 990–992. Retrieved from http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1878875017308598

Johal, J., Ward, R., Gielecki, J., Walocha, J., Natsis, K., Tubbs, R. S., & Loukas, M. (2017). Beware of the predatory science journal: A potential threat to the integrity of medical research. Clinical Anatomy, 30(6), 767–773. Retrieved from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/ca.22899

Kakamad, F. H., Mohammed, S. H., Najar, K. A., Qadr, G. A., Ahmed, J. O., Mohammed, K. K., Salih, R. Q., et al. (2019). Kscien’s list; a new strategy to hoist predatory journals and publishers. International Journal of Surgery Open, 17(January), 5–7. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijso.2019.01.002

Kearney, M. H., Thorne, S., Chinn, P. L., Nicoll, L. H., Pickler, R., D’Antonio, P., Connolly, C., et al. (2015). Predatory publishing: What authors need to know. Research in Nursing and Health, 38(1), 1–3. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25545343

Kebede, M., Schmaus-Klughammer, A. E., & Tekle, B. T. (2017). Manuscript submission invitations from “predatory journals”: What should authors do? Journal of Korean Medical Science, 32(5), 709–712. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5383600/

Kerr, A., & Jager, P. De. (2017). A Description of Predatory Publishing in South African Economics Departments. ESSA 2017 BIENNIAL CONFERENCE. Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa, 59100: Economic Society of South Africa. Retrieved from https://2017.essa.org.za/fullpaper/essa_3649.pdf

Khan, F., & Moher, D. (2017). Predatory Journals: Do Not Enter. University of Ottawa Journal of Medicine. Retrieved from https://uottawa.scholarsportal.info/ottawa/index.php/uojm-jmuo/article/view/1755

Khoo, S. Y., & Lay, B. P. P. (2018). A Very Long Embargo: Journal Choice Reveals Active Non-Compliance with Funder Open Access Policies by Australian and Canadian Neuroscientists. Liber Quarterly, 28, xx–xx. Retrieved from https://www.liberquarterly.eu/article/10.18352/lq.10252

Kim, S., & Choi, H. (2019). Status of digital standards, licensing types, and archiving policies in Asian open access journals registered in Directory of Open Access Journals. Science Editing, 6(1), 41–46. Retrieved from https://www.escienceediting.org/journal/view.php?number=160

Kim, S., Chung, E., & Lee, J. Y. (2018). Latest trends in innovative global scholarly journal publication and distribution platforms. Science Editing, 5(2), 92–104. Retrieved from https://www.escienceediting.org/journal/view.php?number=139

Kimotho, S. G. (2019). The storm around Beall’s List: a review of issues raised by Beall’s critics over his criteria of identifying predatory journals and publishers. African Research Review, 13(2), 1. Retrieved from https://www.ajol.info/index.php/afrrev/article/view/185628

Kingsley, D. A., & Kennan, M. A. (2015). Open Access: The Whipping Boy for Problems in Scholarly Publishing. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37(14), 329–350. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=109101528&site=ehost-live

Kisely, S. (2019). Predatory journals and dubious publishers: how to avoid being their prey. BJPsych Advances, 25(2), 113–119. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/bjpsych-advances/article/predatory-journals-and-dubious-publishers-how-to-avoid-being-their-prey/9CFB3429F20BDFF51055D929C6DCB1C4#

KOÇAK, Z. (2019). Predatory Publishing and Turkey. Balkan Medical Journal, 36(4), 199–201. Retrieved from http://www.balkanmedicaljournal.org/pdf.php?&id=2102

Kolata, G. (2017). Many Academics Are Eager to Publish in Worthless Journals. The New York Times, October 30, 1–4. Retrieved from https://nyti.ms/2iK29TB

Kozak, M., Iefremova, O., & Hartley, J. (2016). Spamming in scholarly publishing: A case study. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(8), 2009–2015. Retrieved from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/asi.23521

Krasowski, M., Lawrence, J., Briggs, A., & Ford, B. (2019). Burden and characteristics of unsolicited emails from medical/scientific journals, conferences, and webinars to faculty and trainees at an academic pathology department. Journal of Pathology Informatics, 10(1), 16. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1703.01550

Krauskopf, E. (2018). An analysis of discontinued journals by Scopus. Scientometrics, 116(3), 1805–1815. Springer International Publishing. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-018-2808-5

Kubiatko, M. (2017). Not every predatory journal is really predatory journal. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(9), 6041–6043. Retrieved from http://www.ejmste.com/pdf-75162-12927?filename=Not Every Predatory.pdf

Kurt, S. (2018). Why do authors publish in predatory journals? Learned Publishing, 31(2), 141–147. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/leap.1150

Laccourreye, O., Rubin, F., & Maisonneuve, H. (2018). “Predatory” journals threatening the scientific medical press. European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Diseases, 135(1), 37–39. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anorl.2017.08.003

Laine, C., & Winker, M. A. (2017). Identifying predatory or pseudo-journals. Biochemia Medica, 27(2), 285–291. Retrieved from http://www.wame.org

Lakhotia, S. C. (2015). Predatory journals and academic pollution. Current Science, 108(8), 107–1408. Retrieved from http://www.currentscience.ac.in/Volumes/108/08/1407.pdf

Lakhotia, S. C. (2017). Mis-Conceived and Mis-Implemented Academic Assessment Rules Underlie the Scourge of Predatory Journals and Conferences. Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy, 83(3), 513–515. Retrieved from http://insa.nic.in/writereaddata/UpLoadedFiles/PINSA/2017_Art49.pdf

Lalu, M. M., Shamseer, L., Cobey, K. D., & Moher, D. (2017). How stakeholders can respond to the rise of predatory journals. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(12), 852–855. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0257-4

Lang, R., Mintz, M., Krentz, H. B., & Gill, M. J. (2019). An approach to conference selection and evaluation: advice to avoid “predatory” conferences. Scientometrics, 118(2), 687–698. Springer International Publishing. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-018-2981-6?utm_source=researcher_app&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=MKEF_USG_Researcher_inbound

Lee, C. J., & Moher, D. (2017). Promote scientific integrity via journal peer review data. Science (New York, N.Y.), 357(6348), 256–257. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28729501

Di Lena, M., & Curtis Nickel, J. (2018). Publish and/or perish: A urological perspective on predatory publications. Canadian Urological Association Journal, 12(8), 239–242. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29629860

Lewinski, A. A., & Oermann, M. H. (2018). Characteristics of E-Mail Solicitations From Predatory Nursing Journals and Publishers. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 49(4), 171–177. Retrieved from https://www.healio.com/doiresolver?doi=10.3928/00220124-20180320-07

Lin, S., & Zhan, L. (2014). Trash journals in China. Learned Publishing, 27(2), 145–154. Retrieved from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1087/20140208

Linacre, S., Bisaccio, M., Earle, L., & Linacre, S. (2019). Publishing in an Environment of Predation: The Many Things You Really Wanted to Know, but Did Not Know How to Ask. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 26(2), 217–228. Routledge. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/1051712X.2019.1603423

 

Predatory Publishing Reading list

 

Machacek, V., & Srholec, M. (2017). Predatory journals in Scopus. Retrieved from https://idea-en.cerge-ei.cz/files/IDEA_Study_2_2017_Predatory_journals_in_Scopus/files/downloads/IDEA_Study_2_2017_Predatory_journals_in_Scopus.pdf

Maddy, A. J., & Tosti, A. (2017). Predatory journals in dermatology. British Journal of Dermatology, 177(1), 307–309. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27639036

Mahajan, R., & Gulati, S. (2017). Predatory Journals: Think before you publish. JK Science, 19(1), 1–2. Retrieved from http://jkscience.org/archives/volume191/Editorial -1.pdf

Manca, A., Cugusi, L., & Deriu, F. (2019). Questioning the efficacy of predatory journals’ blacklists. BJPsych Advances, 25(02), 120–121. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2056467818000725/type/journal_article

Manca, A., Cugusi, L., Dragone, D., & Deriu, F. (2016). Predatory journals: Prevention better than cure? Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 370, 161. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2016.09.052

Manca, A., Martinez, G., Cugusi, L., Dragone, D., Dvir, Z., & Deriu, F. (2017). The surge of predatory open-access in neurosciences and neurology. Neuroscience, 353, 166–173. IBRO. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.04.014

Manca, A., Martinez, G., Cugusi, L., Dragone, D., Mercuro, G., & Deriu, F. (2017). Predatory Open Access in Rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 98(5), 1051–1056. Retrieved from https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0003999317300114

Manca, A., Moher, D., Cugusi, L., Dvir, Z., & Deriu, F. (2018). How predatory journals leak into PubMed. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal, 190(35), E1042–E1045. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30181150

Manley, S. (2019a). Predatory Journals on Trial: Allegations, Responses, and Lessons for Scholarly Publishing from FTC v. OMICS. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 50(3), 183–200. Retrieved from https://utpjournals.press/doi/10.3138/jsp.50.3.02

Manley, S. (2019b). On the limitations of recent lawsuits against Sci‐Hub, OMICS, ResearchGate, and Georgia State University. Learned Publishing, (June). Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/leap.1254

Marković, S., & Racz, A. (2018). Worth(less) papers - are journal impact factor and number of citations suitable indicators to evaluate quality of scientists? Nova prisutnost, XVI(2), 369–388. Retrieved from https://hrcak.srce.hr/203400

Markowitz, D. M., Powell, J. H., Hancock, J. T., Dassault, S., Kaplan, National, I., Ncees, et al. (2014). The writing style of predatory publishers. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings (p. [22 p.]). Retrieved from http://www.asee.org/public/conferences/32/papers/8614/view

Masten, Y., & Ashcraft, A. (2017). Due diligence in the open-access explosion era: choosing a reputable journal for publication. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 364(21), 1–7. Retrieved from http://academic.oup.com/femsle/article/doi/10.1093/femsle/fnx206/4411800

Matumba, L., Maulidi, F., Balehegn, M., Abay, F., Salanje, G., Dzimbiri, L., & Kaunda, E. (2019). Blacklisting or Whitelisting? Deterring Faculty in Developing Countries from Publishing in Substandard Journals. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 50(2), 83–95. Retrieved from https://utpjournals.press/doi/10.3138/jsp.50.2.01

McCann, T. V, & Polacsek, M. (2018). False gold: Safely navigating open access publishing to avoid predatory publishers and journals. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 74(4), 809–817. Retrieved from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/jan.13483

McCool, J. H. (2017). Opinion: Why I Published in a Predatory Journal. Scientist, 31(6), 1–7. Retrieved from http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/49071/title/Opinion--Why-I-Published-in-a-Predatory-Journal/

McCutcheon, L. E., Aruguete, M. S., J., S. M., Jenkins, W., Williams, J. L., McCarley, N., Rivardo, M., et al. (2016). How Questionable Are Predatory Social Science Journals? North American Journal of Psychology, 18(3), 427–440. Retrieved from https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1G1-472268221/how-questionable-are-predatory-social-science-journals

McLeod, A., Savage, A., & Simkin, M. G. (2018). The Ethics of Predatory Journals. Journal of Business Ethics, 153(1), 121–131. Springer Netherlands. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10551-016-3419-9

McNaught, K. (2015). The Changing Publication Practices in Academia: Inherent Uses and Issues in Open Access and Online Publishing and the Rise of Fraudulent Publications. The Journal of Electronic Publishing, 18(3), 1–13. Michigan Publishing, University of Michigan Library. Retrieved from http://quod.lib.umich.edu/j/jep/3336451.0018.308?view=text;rgn=main

Van Meerbeek, B., & Frankenberger, R. (2018). From open-access to “predatory” publishing. J Adhes Dent, 20(4), 2018. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30206569

Melchior, J. K. (2018). Fake News Comes to Academia - How three scholars gulled academic journals to publish hoax papers on ‘grievance studies.’’.’ Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from https://www.wsj.com/articles/fake-news-comes-to-academia-1538520950

Memon, A. R. (2017). ResearchGate and impact factor: A step further on predatory journals. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 67(1), 148–149. Retrieved from https://jpma.org.pk/article-details/8065

Memon, A. R. (2018a). Predatory Journals Spamming for Publications: What Should Researchers Do? Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(5), 1617–1639. Springer Netherlands. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11948-017-9955-6

Memon, A. R. (2018b). More than black and white of scientific publishing. Rheumatology International, 38(2), 315–316. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-017-3880-5

Memon, A. R. (2018c). How to respond to and what to do for papers published in predatory journals? Science Editing, 5(2), 146–149. Retrieved from http://escienceediting.org/journal/view.php?doi=10.6087/kcse.140

Memon, A. R. (2018d). End of 2016: Can We Save Research from Predators in 2017? Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(4), 1339–1345. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11948-017-9915-1

Memon, A. R., & Azim, M. E. (2018). Predatory conferences: Addressing researchers from developing countries. J Pak Med Assoc, 68(11), 1691–1695. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30410151

Miller, E., & DeBerg, J. (2017). The Perils of Predatory Publishing: Views and Advice from an Editor and a Health Sciences Librarian. Pain Management Nursing, 18(6), 351–352. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2017.10.003

Milton, C. L. (2019). Predatory Publishing in Nursing. Nursing Science Quarterly, 32(3), 180–181. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0894318419845400

Misra, D. P., Ravindran, V., Wakhlu, A., Sharma, A., Agarwal, V., Negi, V. S., Vir, et al. (2017). Publishing in black and white: the relevance of listing of scientific journals. Rheumatology International, 37(11), 1773–1778. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28983732

Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Cobey, K. D., Lalu, M. M., Galipeau, J., Avey, M. T., Ahmadzai, N., et al. (2017). Stop this waste of people, animals and money. Nature, 549(7670), 23–25. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/549023a

Moher, D., & Srivastava, A. (2015). You are invited to submit. BMC Med, 13, 180. Retrieved from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/13/180%5Cnhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4524126/pdf/12916_2015_Article_423.pdf

Molchanovа, A., Chunikhina, N., & Strielkowski, W. (2017). Innovations and academic publishing: who will cast the first stone? Marketing and Management of Innovations, (4), 40–48. Retrieved from http://mmi.fem.sumdu.edu.ua/en/journals/2017/4/40-48

More than 5,000 German scientists have published papers in pseudo-scientific journals. (2018). NDR.de - Der NDR - Presse. Retrieved August 13, 2018, from https://www.ndr.de/der_ndr/presse/More-than-5000-German-scientists-have-published-papers-in-pseudo-scientific-journals,fakescience178.html

Moustafa, K. (2014). Fake Journals: Not Always Valid Ways to Distinguish Them. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(5), 1391–1392. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9608-y

Mouton, J., & Valentine, A. (2017). The extent of South African authored articles in predatory journals. South African Journal of Science, 113(7/8), 1–9. Retrieved from https://www.sajs.co.za/article/view/3995

Munk, P. L., & O’Keeffe, M. E. (2017). Defending the Truth in a Post-Truth Era. Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal, 68(3), 231. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carj.2017.06.001

Murphy, J. A. (2019). Predatory Publishing and the Response from the Scholarly Community. Serials Review, 0(0), 1–6. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2019.1624910

Nagoba, B., Davane, M., & Mumbre, S. (2017). Is it possible to control publication of predatory journals? Medical Journal Armed Forces India, 73(3), 314–315. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2017.05.001

Natarajan, S., & Nair, A. (2016). ”FakeBooks” - predatory journals: The dark side of publishing. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 64(2), 107. Retrieved from http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2016/64/2/107/179733

Nazarovets, S., Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Nazarovets, M. (2019). Challenge of Ukrainian academic librarians in an evolving scholarly publishing landscape. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 45(1), 9–14. Retrieved from https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0099133318301411

Nelson, N., & Huffman, J. (2015). Predatory Journals in Library Databases: How Much Should We Worry? The Serials Librarian, 69(2), 169–192. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0361526X.2015.1080782

Neylon, C. (2015). Researcher as victim. Researcher as predator. Science in the Open. Retrieved from https://cameronneylon.net/blog/researcher-as-victim-researcher-as-predator/

Neylon, C. (2017). Blacklists are technically infeasible, practically unreliable and unethical. Period. Science in the Open, 1–7. Retrieved from http://cameronneylon.net/blog/blacklists-are-technically-infeasible-practically-unreliable-and-unethical-period/

Nicholson, D. R. (2017). Predatory Publishing Practices: Is There Life After Beall’s List? libres, 27(2), 53–70. Retrieved from https://www.libres-ejournal.info/2565/

Nnaji, J. C. (2018). Illegitimate Academic Publishing: A Need for Sustainable Global Action. Publishing Research Quarterly, 34(4), 515–528. Springer US. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-018-9614-z

Noga-Styron, K. E., Olivero, J. M., & Britto, S. (2016). Predatory Journals in the Criminal Justices Sciences: Getting our Cite on the Target. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 1253(August), 1–18. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10511253.2016.1195421

Van Nuland, S. E., & Rogers, K. A. (2017). Academic nightmares: Predatory publishing. Anatomical Sciences Education, 10(4), 392–394. Retrieved from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/ase.1671

Nwagwu, W E. (2016). Open Access in the Developing Regions: Situating the Altercations About Predatory Publishing. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 40(1), 58–80. Retrieved from https://muse.jhu.edu/article/611577/pdf

Nwagwu, Williams E, & Ojemeni, O. (2015). Penetration of nigerian predatory biomedical open access journals 2007-2012: A bibiliometric study. Learned Publishing, 28(1), 23–34. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1087/20150105

Nwagwu, Williams Ezinwa. (2015). Counterpoints about predatory open access and knowledge publishing in Africa. Learned Publishing, 28(2), 114–122. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1087/20150205

O’Kelly, F., & Koyle, M. A. (2019). Response to Editorial commentary: predatory publishing or a lack of peer-review transparency?—a contemporary analysis of indexed open and non-open access articles in pediatric urology. Journal of Pediatric Urology, 15(2), 163. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.08.019

Oermann, M. H., Conklin, J. L., Nicoll, L. H., Chinn, P. L., Ashton, K. S., Edie, A. H., Amarasekara, S., et al. (2016). Study of Predatory Open Access Nursing Journals. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 48(6), 624–632. Retrieved from https://sigmapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jnu.12248

Oermann, M. H., Nicoll, L. H., Carter-Templeton, H., Woodward, A., Kidayi, P. L., Neal, L. B., Edie, A. H., et al. (2019). Citations of articles in predatory nursing journals. Nursing Outlook, 0, 7–13. Elsevier Inc. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2019.05.001

Oermann, M. H., Nicoll, L. H., Chinn, P. L., Ashton, K. S., Conklin, J. L., Edie, A. H., Amarasekara, S., et al. (2018). Quality of articles published in predatory nursing journals. Nursing Outlook, 66(1), 4–10. Elsevier Inc. Retrieved from http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0029655417300696

Ogunbanjo, G. A. (2018). Publishing in predatory journals: Time for reflections. South African Family Practice, 60(2), 4. Retrieved from https://journals.co.za/content/journal/10520/EJC-101937703f

Olivarez, J. D., Bales, S., Sare, L., & VanDuinkerken, W. (2018). Format Aside: Applying Beall’s Criteria to Assess the Predatory Nature of both OA and Non-OA Library and Information Science Journals. College & Research Libraries, 79(1), 52–67. Retrieved from http://crl.acrl.org/content/early/2016/12/22/crl16-944.short

Olson, C. A. (2017). Caveat Scholar: On the Growth of Predatory Publishing. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 37(1), 1–2. Retrieved from http://insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=00005141-201703710-00001

Omer, J., Mohammed, S. H., Salih, R. Q., Kakamad, F. H., Mikael, T. M., Mohammed, K. K., Aziz, M. S., et al. (2019). Predatory journals in psychiatry. The Lancet Psychiatry, 6(7), 564–565. Retrieved from https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2215036619301853

Omobowale, A. O., Akanle, O., & Adeniran, A. I. (2014). Peripheral scholarship and the context of foreign paid publishing in Nigeria. Current Sociology, 62(5), 666–684. Retrieved from http://csi.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0011392113508127

Omonijo, D., Uche, O. O., Chine, B., Anyaegbunam, M., George, T., & Awosope, C. (2015). The Proliferation of Hijacked Journals: Sensitizing Scholars in Nigerian Higher Education System. European Journal of Social Sciences, 50(1), 107–118. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2801494

Oravec, J. A. (2019). The “Dark Side” of Academics? Emerging Issues in the Gaming and Manipulation of Metrics in Higher Education. The Review of Higher Education, 42(3), 859–877. Retrieved from https://muse.jhu.edu/article/720763

Owens, J. K., & Nicoll, L. H. (2019). Plagiarism in Predatory Publications: A Comparative Study of Three Nursing Journals. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 51(3), 356–363. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jnu.12475

Pai, Madhukar; Franco, E. (2016). What Are Predatory Open Access Journals and Why Should We Worry? Huffpost, 13, 1–8. Retrieved from http://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2

Park, J.-H. (2019). Publication ethics workshop: how to cope with predatory journals. Science Editing, 6(1), 80–82. Retrieved from http://escienceediting.org/journal/view.php?doi=10.6087/kcse.160

Park, S. P., Lee, E. Y. J., & Suh, J. H. (2018). Arbitral action and preventive methods against predatory journal practice. Science Editing, 5(1), 49–52. Retrieved from http://www.escienceediting.org/journal/view.php?doi=10.6087/kcse.118

Patwardhan, B. (2019). India strikes back against predatory journals. Nature, 571, 7. Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02023-7

Pearson, G. S. (2016). Open Access and Predatory Journals: Two Very Different Entities. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 22(6), 447–448. Retrieved from http://jap.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/1078390316668478

Perlin, M. S., Imasato, T., & Borenstein, D. (2018). Is predatory publishing a real threat? Evidence from a large database study. Scientometrics, 116(1), 255–273. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2750-6

Petri, A.-I. (2016). Evolving strategies of the predatory journals. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 21(1), 1–17. Retrieved from https://jice.um.edu.my/index.php/MJLIS/article/view/1714

Petrisor, A.-I., & Petrişor, A.-I. (2017). Are the predatory publishers collapsing or re-inventing themselves? Libres, 27(2), 71–79. Retrieved from https://www.libres-ejournal.info/2570/

Petrisor, A. (2018). Predatory Publishers using Spamming Strategies for Call for Papers and Review Requests: A Case Study. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 38(3), 199–207. Retrieved from http://microblogging.infodocs.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/12551-38504-1-PB.pdf

Pettit, B. E. (2018). These Professors Don’t Work for a Predatory Publisher. It Keeps Claiming They Do. Chronicle of Higher Education, 2–5. Retrieved from https://www.chronicle.com/article/These-Professors-Don-t-Work/244120

Pierce, G., & Theodossiou, I. (2018). Open access publishing: a service or a detriment to science? Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 18, 37–48. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/ESEP00184

Pond, B., Brown, S., Stewart, D., Roane, D., & Harirforoosh, S. (2018). Faculty Applicants Attempt to Inflate CVs Using Predatory Journals. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 83(1), 12–14. Retrieved from https://www.ajpe.org/doi/full/10.5688/ajpe7210

Power, H. (2018). Predatory Publishing: How to Safely Navigate the Waters of Open Access. The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres, 50(1), 3–8. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0844562117748287

Pyne, D. (2017). The Rewards of Predatory Publications at a Small Business School. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 48(3), 137–160. Retrieved from http://utpjournals.press/doi/10.3138/jsp.48.3.137

Quek, H. C., Teo, E. K., Houghton, F., & Houghton, S. (2018). Predatory publishing; pressures, promotions and perils. Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare, 27(1), 3–5. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2010105818775434

Raghavan, R., Dahanukar, N., Knight, J. D. M., Bijukumar, A., Katwate, U., Krishnakumar, K., Ali, A., et al. (2014). Predatory journals and Indian ichthyology. Current Science, 107(5), 740–742. Retrieved from http://www.i-scholar.in/index.php/CURS/article/view/87043/0

Rahman, A. I. M. J., Dexters, N., & Engels, T. C. E. (2014). Predatory open access journals in a performance-based funding model: Common journals in Beall’s list and in the VABB -SHW. Antwerpen. Retrieved from http://eprints.rclis.org/28857/

Raj, A. T., Panta, P., & Patil, S. (2019). Plagiarism , P-hacking , and Predatory Journals: Toxic Triple Ps of Scientific Publications. Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, 20(2), 129–130. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31058624

Rama, K. (2019). Unethical publishing behavior of an Indian predatory journal: a case study. Library Philosophy and Practice. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/2597/

Ranjeeta, Sumati., A, H. (2018). Predatory journals: A threat to evidence‑based science. Indian J Health Sci Biomed Res, 12, 12–14. Retrieved from http://link.galegroup.com.prx-usa.lirn.net/apps/doc/A503411017/AONE?u=lirn55718&sid=AONE&xid=59b22182

Ray, M. (2016). An Expanded Approach to Evaluating Open Access Journals. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 47(4), 307–327. Retrieved from https://utpjournals.press/doi/10.3138/jsp.47.4.307

Revés, J., Marques, B., Durão, J., Ribeiro, N. V., Lemos, S., & Escada, P. (2018). Predatory Publishing: An Industry that Is Threatening Science. Acta Med Port, 31(3), 141–143. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29790463

Reynolds, R. R. (2016). The predatory publishing phenomenon: dead end or just an inconvenience on the road to a new scholarly publishing landscape? Insights the UKSG journal, 29(3), 233–238. Retrieved from http://insights.uksg.org/articles/10.1629/uksg.325/

Rich, T. S. (2016). Predatory Publishing, Open Access, and the Costs to Academia. PS: Political Science & Politics, 49(02), 265–267. Retrieved from http://www.journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S1049096516000172

Richtig, G., Berger, M., Lange-Asschenfeldt, B., Aberer, W., & Richtig, E. (2018). Problems and challenges of predatory journals. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 32(9), 1441–1449. Retrieved from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/jdv.15039

Richtig, G., Richtig, M., Hoetzenecker, W., Saxinger, W., Lange-Asschenfeldt, B., Steiner, A., Strohal, R., et al. (2018). Knowledge and Influence of Predatory Journals in Dermatology: A Pan-Austrian Survey. Acta Dermato Venereologica, 99, 58–62. Retrieved from http://www.medicaljournals.se/acta/content/abstract/10.2340/00015555-3037

Rifai, N., Annesley, T. M., Scott Moore, Arthur L. Caplan, D. J. S., Hornung, P., Rosendaal, & R., F. (2019). Maintaining Research and Publication Integrity. Clinical Chemistry, 65(2), 230–235. Retrieved from http://clinchem.aaccjnls.org/content/65/2/230

Ring, J. (2018). Predatory journals abuse the flood of publishable material. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 32(4), 511–512. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29575343

Rivera, H. (2019). Fake Peer Review and Inappropriate Authorship Are Real Evils. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 34(2), 6–8. Retrieved from https://synapse.koreamed.org/DOIx.php?id=10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e6

Roberts, J. (2016a). Predatory Journals: Illegitimate Publishing and Its Threat to All Readers and Authors. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 13(12), 1830–1833. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.10.008

Roberts, J. (2016b). Predatory Journals: think before you submit. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain, 56(4), 618–621. Retrieved from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/head.12818

Ross-White, A., Godfrey, C. M., Sears, K. A., & Wilson, R. (2019). Predatory publications in evidence syntheses. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 107(1), 57–61. Retrieved from http://jmla.pitt.edu/ojs/jmla/article/view/491

Rupp, M., Anastasopoulou, L., Wintermeyer, E., Malhaan, D., El Khassawna, T., & Heiss, C. (2019). Predatory journals: a major threat in orthopaedic research. International Orthopaedics, 43(3), 509–517. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30288548

Samuel, A., & Aranha, V. (2018). Valuable Research in Fake Journals and Self-boasting with Fake Metrics. Journal of Pediatric Neuroscience, 13(1), 517–518. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6413586/

Sanz, Á., & del Valle, M. L. (2019). Predatory Publishing in Palliative Care. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 57(6), e4–e5. Retrieved from https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0885392419300545

Sarr, M. G., & Behrns, K. E. (2019). Potential benefit and harm of social media and predatory publishing: a commentary on “Antibiotic-treated acute appendicitis—reception in social media.” Langenbeck’s Archives of Surgery, 404(3), 351–352. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00423-019-01778-x

Schepers, T., & Rammelt, S. (2019). The burden of predatory journal and congress requests in foot and ankle surgery. Fuss und Sprunggelenk, 17(2), 61–67. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuspru.2019.03.001

Schira, H. R., & Hurst, C. (2019). Hype or Real Threat: The Extent of Predatory Journals in Student Bibliographies. Theory and Research, 14(1), 1–16. Retrieved from https://journal.lib.uoguelph.ca/index.php/perj/article/view/4764

Schmidt, P. (2017). Does It Pay to Be Published in ‘Predatory’’ Journals?’ Chronicle of Higher Education, 9–11. Retrieved from https://www.chronicle.com/article/Does-It-Pay-to-Be-Published-in/240202

Seadle, M. (2019). Publication quality, peer review and predatory journals. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 55(1), 730–731. Retrieved from https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/pra2.2018.14505501094

Seethapathy, G. S., Kumar, J. U. S., & Hareesha, A. S. (2016). India’s scientific publication in predatory journals: need for regulating quality of Indian science and education. Current Science, 111(11), 1759–1764. Retrieved from https://www.currentscience.ac.in/Volumes/111/11/1759.pdf

Sener, M., Davulcu, C. D., Tahta, M., & Gunal, I. (2019). Predatory journal preference in the field of Orthopaedics and Traumatology in Turkey. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, (xxxx), 4–7. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2019.05.003

Severin, A., & Low, N. (2019). Readers beware! Predatory journals are infiltrating citation databases. International Journal of Public Health, 3, 3–4. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-019-01284-3

Shaghaei, N., Wien, C., Holck, J. P., Thiesen, A. L., Ellegaard, O., Vlachos, E., & Drachen, T. M. (2018). Being a Deliberate Prey of a Predator – Researchers’ Thoughts after having Published in a Predatory Journal. Liber Quarterly, 28. Retrieved from https://www.liberquarterly.eu/article/10.18352/lq.10259

Shalom, G. (2019). Predatory Journals in Dermatology: A Hidden Danger. Acta Dermato Venereologica, 99, 4. Retrieved from http://www.medicaljournals.se/acta/content/abstract/10.2340/00015555-3038

Shamim, T. (2018). Strategies to curb young researchers from predatory publishers. Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism, 6(2), 92–93. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5856910/

Shamin, T. (2019). Polite invitation to submit an article. Saudi Journal of Anesthesia, 13(3), 281. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6625286/

Shamseer, L., Moher, D., Maduekwe, O., Turner, L., Barbour, V., Burch, R., Clark, J., et al. (2017). Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison. BMC Medicine, 15(1), 28. BMC Medicine. Retrieved from http://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-017-0785-9

Sharma, D. C. (2019). OMICS, Publisher of Fake Journals, Makes Cosmetic Changes to Evade Detection. The Wire, 1–6. Retrieved from https://thewire.in/the-sciences/omics-publisher-of-fake-journals-makes-cosmetic-changes-to-evade-detection

Sharma, H., & Verma, S. (2018). Predatory journals: The rise of worthless biomedical science. Journal of postgraduate medicine, 64(4), 226–231. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6198688/

Sharma, K., Rani, M., & Sharma, L. (2019). Scrutinizing predator journals in pharmacology and calculating their predatory rate. Indian Journal of Pharmacology, 51(3), 208–211. Retrieved from http://www.ijp-online.com/article.asp?issn=0253-7613;year=2019;volume=51;issue=3;spage=208;epage=211;aulast=Sharma

Shehata, A. M. K., & Elgllab, M. F. M. (2018). Where Arab social science and humanities scholars choose to publish: Falling in the predatory journals trap. Learned Publishing, 31(3), 222–229. Retrieved from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/leap.1167

Shen, C. (2015). Predatory Journal Biz Booming. The Scientist Magazine, (1), 1–3. Retrieved from https://www.the-scientist.com/the-nutshell/predatory-journal-biz-booming-34718

Shen, C., & Björk, B. (2015). ‘Predatory’’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics.’ BMC Medicine, 13(1), 230. BMC Medicine. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2

Shuva, N. Z., & Taisir, R. (2016). Faculty members perceptions and use of open access journals: Bangladesh perspective. IFLA Journal, 42(1), 36–48. Retrieved from http://ifl.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0340035216628879

Siegel, T. J. (2018). Predatory publishing: What authors need to know. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 13(3), 156. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2018.03.002

Siemens, D. R. (2017). Pop psychology and predatory journals. Canadian Urological Association Journal, 11(12). Retrieved from http://www.cuaj.ca/cuaj/index.php/journal/article/view/4993

Sile, L., Guns, R., & Engels, T. C. E. (2018). Comparing VABB-SHW (version VII) with Beall’s list s and DOAJ. Retrieved from https://doc.anet.be/docman/docman.phtml?file=.irua.7df2a7.139654.pdf

Siler, K. (2018). Demarcating Legitimate and Predatory Scientific Publishing: The Influence of Status on Institutional Logic Conflicts, 1–49. Retrieved from https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/6r274/

Silver, A. (2017). Pay-to-view blacklist of predatory journals set to launch. Nature. Retrieved October 6, 2017, from https://www.nature.com/news/pay-to-view-blacklist-of-predatory-journals-set-to-launch-1.22090

Simón, A. (2016). Pitfalls of Predatory Journals. Comprehensive Psychology, 5, 1–5. Retrieved from http://cop.sagepub.com/lookup/doi/10.1177/2165222816631691

Singh Chawla, D. (2018). The undercover academic keeping tabs on ‘predatory’’ publishing.’ Nature, 555(7697), 422–423. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/d41586-018-02921-2

Singh, S., & Remenyi, D. (2016). Researchers Beware of Predatory and Counterfeit Journals: Are Academics Gullible? Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 14(1), 50–59. Retrieved from http://www.ejbrm.com/issue/download.html?idArticle=435

Singh, S., Remenyi, D., & Singh, S. (2016). Plagiarism and ghostwriting: The rise in academic misconduct. South African Journal of Science S Afr J Sci, 112112(7), 2015–2300. Retrieved from https://www.sajs.co.za/article/view/4078

Smith, G. (2015). Predatory publishing houses: Challenging the legitimacy of open access journals. Australian Journal of Paramedicine, 12(2), 2–4. Retrieved from https://ajp.paramedics.org/index.php/ajp/article/view/234

Smith, K. L. (2017). Examining publishing practices: moving beyond the idea of predatory open access. Insights the UKSG journal, 30(3), 4–10. Retrieved from http://insights.uksg.org/articles/10.1629/uksg.388/

Soler, J., & Cooper, A. (2017). “We have learned your paper”: academic inequality and the discourse of parasite publishers. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/32961761/_We_have_learned_your_paper_._Academic_inequality_and_the_discourse_of_parasite_publishers

Solomon, D., & Björk, B.-C. (2016). Article Processing Charges for Open Access publication: the situation for research intensive universities in the USA and Canada. PeerJ, (Aug.), 1–19. Retrieved from https://peerj.com/articles/2264/

Some science journals that claim to peer review papers do not do so. (2018). The Economist, 1–5. Retrieved from https://www.economist.com/science-and-technology/2018/06/23/some-science-journals-that-claim-to-peer-review-papers-do-not-do-so?fsrc=scn/fb/te/bl/ed/somesciencejournalsthatclaimtopeerreviewpapersdonotdosopublishanddontbedamned

Somoza-Fernández, M., Rodríguez-Gairín, J.-M., & Urbano, C. (2016). Presence of alleged predatory journals in bibliographic databases: Analysis of Beall’s list. El Profesional de la Información, 25(5), 730. Retrieved from http://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/EPI/article/view/epi.2016.sep.03

Sorokowski, P., Kulczycki, E., Sorokowska, A., & Pisanski, K. (2017). Predatory journals recruit fake editor. Nature, 543(7646), 481–483. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/543481a

Sorooshian, S. (2016). Publication phishing: a growing challenge for researchers and scientific societies. Current Science, 110(5), 766–767. Retrieved from http://www.currentscience.ac.in/Volumes/110/05/0766.pdf

Spears, T. O. M. (2019). When pigs fly: Fake science conferences abound for fraud and profit. Ottawa Citizen, 4–7. Retrieved from https://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-news/when-pigs-fly-fake-science-conferences-abound-for-fraud-and-profit

Sterligov, I., & Savina, T. (2016). Riding with the Metric Tide: ‘Predatory’’ Journals in Scopus.’ Higher Education in Russia and Beyond, 1(7)(7), 9–12. Retrieved from https://herb.hse.ru/data/2016/03/02/1125175286/3.pdf

Stober, C., de Costa e Silva, M., Moher, D., Hutton, B., Clemons, M., Mazzarello, S., Cobey, K. D., et al. (2017). Is This Conference for Real? Navigating Presumed Predatory Conference Invitations. Journal of Oncology Practice, 13(7), 410–413. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.

Stöckelová, T., & Vostal, F. (2017). Academic stratospheres-cum-underworlds: when highs and lows of publication cultures meet. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 69(5), 516–528. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-01-2017-0013

Stojanovski, J. (2017). Does small equal predatory? Analysis of publication charges and transparency of editorial policies in Croatian open access journals. Biochemia Medica, 27(2), 292–299. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28694721

Stone, T. E., & Rossiter, R. C. (2015). Predatory publishing: Take care that you are not caught in the Open Access net. Nursing & Health Sciences, 17(3), 277–279. Retrieved from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/nhs.12215

Strielkowski, W., & Gryshova, I. (2018). Academic Publishing and «Predatory» Journals. Science and innovation, 14(1), 5–12. Retrieved from http://scinn.org.ua/en/archive/14(1)/14(1)01

Strielkowski, Wadim. (2018). Predatory Publishing: What Are the Alternatives to Beall’s List? The American Journal of Medicine, 131(4), 333–334. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.10.054

Strinzel, M., Severin, A., Milzow, K., & Egger, M. (2019). “Blacklists” and “whitelists” to tackle predatory publishing: a Cross-Sectional Comparison and Thematic Analysis Michaela. Therapeutics and Prevention, 10(3), 1–16. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.27532v1

Sun, L. (2019). Journals removed from DOAJ appearing within SCImago’s ranks: A study of excluded journals. Learned Publishing, 32(3), 207–211. Retrieved from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/leap.1216

Swanberg, MSI, AHIP, S. M. (2017). Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR). Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(1), 270–272. Retrieved from http://jmla.pitt.edu/ojs/jmla/article/view/120

Swauger, S. (2017). Open access, power, and privilege. C&RL News, 603–606. Retrieved from https://crln.acrl.org/index.php/crlnews/article/view/16837/18435

Sygocki, W., & Korzeniewska, E. (2019). How much is Impact Factor worth? 2019 Applications of Electromagnetics in Modern Engineering and Medicine (PTZE) (pp. 228–231). IEEE. Retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8781744/

Tarkang, E. E., & Bain, L. E. (2019). The bane of publishing a research article in international journals by African researchers, the peer-review process and the contentious issue of predatory journals: a commentary. Pan African Medical Journal, 32, 1–5. Retrieved from http://www.panafrican-med-journal.com/content/article/32/119/full/

Taylor, Z. W. (2019). The Hunter Became the Hunted: A Graduate Student’s Experiences with Predatory Publishing. Publishing Research Quarterly, 35(1), 122–137. Springer US. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12109-019-09639-7

Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2013). Predatory publishing: a quantitative assessment, the Predatory Score. Asian and Australasian Journal of Plant Science and Biotechnology, 7, 21–34. Retrieved from http://www.globalsciencebooks.info/Online/GSBOnline/images/2013/AAJPSB_7(SI1)/AAJPSB_7(SI1)21-34o.pdf

Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2015). Issues in science publishing: what’s hot and what’s not? Kome, 3(1), 81–87. Retrieved from http://www.hindawi.com/journals/aaa/2008/636843/

Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2016). The Militarization of Science, and Subsequent Criminalization of Scientists. Journal of Interdisciplinary Medicine, 1(2), 214–215. Retrieved from http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/jim.2016.1.issue-2/jim-2016-0031/jim-2016-0031.xml

Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2017a). Preprints: ethical hazard or academic liberation? Kome, 5(2), 73–80. Retrieved from http://komejournal.com/files/KOME_JATdSpreprints.pdf

Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2017b). Jeffrey Beall’s “predatory” lists must not be used: they are biased, flawed, opaque and inaccurate. Bibliothecae.it, 6(1), 428–436. Retrieved from https://bibliothecae.unibo.it/article/view/7044

Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2017c). Caution with the continued use of Jeffrey Beall’s “predatory” open access publishing lists. AME Medical Journal, 2(July), 97–97. Retrieved from http://amj.amegroups.com/article/view/3946/4658

Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2017d). Why does retraction watch continue to offer support to Jeffrey Beall, and legitimize his post-mortem “predatory” lists? Kome, 5(1), 147–152. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85022002127&doi=10.17646%2FKOME.2017.19&partnerID=40&md5=44cfceda3438f7c82e68c5fbce488809

Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2017e). The Ethical and Academic Implications of the Jeffrey Beall (www.scholarlyoa.com) Blog Shutdown. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1–3. Springer Netherlands. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11948-017-9905-3

Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Al-Khatib, A. (2016). The Macro and Micro Scale of Open Access Predation. Publishing Research Quarterly, 33(1), 92–100. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12109-016-9495-y

Teixeira da Silva, J. A., Dobránszki, J., Al-Khatib, A., & Tsigaris, P. (2018). Challenges facing the DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals) as a reliable source of open access publishing venues. Journal of Educational Media and Library Sciences, 55(3), 349–358. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328275390_Challenges_facing_the_DOAJ_Directory_of_Open_Access_Journals_as_a_reliable_source_of_open_access_publishing_venues

Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Tsigaris, P. (2018a). What Value Do Journal Whitelists and Blacklists Have in Academia? The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 44(6), 781–792. Elsevier. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2018.09.017

Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Tsigaris, P. (2018b). Academics must list all publications on their CV. Kome, 6(1), 94–99. Retrieved from http://komejournal.com/files/KOME_JATdSPT.pdf

Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Tsigaris, P. (2019). How hyped media and misleading editorials can influence impressions about Beall’s lists of “predatory” publications. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society. Retrieved from https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/JICES-06-2018-0059

Tin, L., Ivana, B., Biljana, B., Ljubica, I. B., Dragan, M., Dušan, S., Blesic, I., et al. (2014). Predatory and Fake Scientific Journals / Publishers – A Global Outbreak with Rising Trend: A Review. Geographica Pannonica, 18(3), 69–81. Retrieved from http://www.dgt.uns.ac.rs/pannonica/papers/volume18_3_3.pdf

Torrence, M. C., & Ariew, S. (2015). The Changing Nature of OA Journals: Helping Scholars Identify the Good, the Bad, and the Political. Charleston Library Conference (pp. 578–582). Retrieved from https://2015charlestonconference.sched.com/event/4C98/the-changing-nature-of-oa-journals-helping-scholars-identify-the-good-the-bad-and-the-political

Tosti, A., & Maddy, A. J. (2017). Ranking predatory journals in dermatology: distinguishing the bad from the ugly. International Journal of Dermatology, 56(7), 718–720. Retrieved from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/ijd.13644

Trishchenko, N. (2019). DOAJ Media and Communications Journals: Business Models, Technical Aspects and Involvement in the International Scientific Process. Observatorio (OBS*) journal, 13(1), 212–225. Retrieved from http://obs.obercom.pt/index.php/obs/article/view/1422

Truth, F. (2012). Pay big to publish fast: Academic journal rackets. J Crit Educ Policy Studies, 10(2), 54–105. Retrieved from http://www.jceps.com/archives/710

Tsikliras, Stergiou, K. (2013). What’s on the (publication fee) menu, who pays the bill and what should be the venue? Mediterranean Marine Science, 14(2), 363–364. Retrieved from https://ejournals.epublishing.ekt.gr/index.php/hcmr-med-mar-sc/article/view/12426/0

Tulandi, T., & Balayla, J. (2019). Predatory Journals and Junk Meetings. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 41(5), 579–580. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2019.02.012

Umlauf, M. G., & Mochizuki, Y. (2018). Predatory publishing and cybercrime targeting academics. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 24, e12656. Retrieved from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/ijn.12656

Vakil, C. (2019). Predatory journals Authors and readers beware. Canadian Family Physician, 65, 92–94. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30765346

Vence, T. (2017a). Identifying Predatory Publishers. The Scientist, 1–6. Retrieved from http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/49862/title/Identifying-Predatory-Publishers/

Vence, T. (2017b). On Blacklists and Whitelists. The Scientist, (July 17), 1–4. Retrieved from https://www.the-scientist.com/careers/on-blacklists-and-whitelists-31209

Vogel, L. (2017). Researchers may be part of the problem in predatory publishing. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 189(42), E1324–E1325. Retrieved from http://www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.109-5507

Wadim, S., Inna, G., & Maryna, S. (2017). Predatory Publishing and Beall’s List: Lessons for the countries adapting novel research evaluation criteria. Science and Education, 23(8), 39–43. Retrieved from http://scienceandeducation.pdpu.edu.ua/doc/2017/8_2017/5.pdf

Wager, E. (2017). Why we should worry less about predatory publishers and more about the quality of research and training at our academic institutions. Journal of Epidemiology, 27(3), 87–88. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.je.2017.01.001

Wallace, F., & Perri, T. (2016). Economists behaving badly: Publications in predatory journals Economists Behaving Badly: Publications in Predatory Journals. RePEc Archive, (73075), 1–26. Retrieved from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/73075/

Wallace, W. A. (2019). Publish and be damned: The damage being created by predatory publishing. The Bone & Joint Journal, 101-B(5), 500–501. Retrieved from https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/10.1302/0301-620X.101B5.BJJ-2018-1330.R1

Watson, R. (2017). Beall’s list of predatory open access journals: RIP. Nursing Open, 4(2), 60–60. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5340161/

Watson, R. (2019a). Predatory publishing continues. Nursing Open, 6(1), 4–4. Retrieved from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/nop2.226

Watson, R. (2019b). Predatory journals and the pollution of academic publishing. Journal of Nursing Management, 27(2), 223–224. Retrieved from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/jonm.12739

Wehrmeijer, M. (2014). Exposing the predators Methods to stop predatory journals. Leiden. Retrieved from https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/handle/1887/28943

Weingart, P. (2016). Trust, Quality Assurance and Open Access: Predatory Journals and the Future of the Scholarly Publication System. The Future of Scholarly Publishing: Open Access and the Economics of Digitisation (pp. 265–271). Retrieved from http://www0.sun.ac.za/scistip/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Weingart_P.pdf

Wicherts, J. M. (2016). Peer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription Journals. (G. E. Derrick, Ed.)PLOS ONE, 11(1), e0147913. Retrieved from https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147913

Wild, S. (2017). Guide: How to spot predatory academic journals in the wild. Retrieved from https://africacheck.org/factsheets/guide-how-to-spot-predatory-academic-journals-in-the-wild/

Wilkinson, T. A., Russell, C. J., Bennett, W. E., Cheng, E. R., & Carroll, A. E. (2019). A cross-sectional study of predatory publishing emails received by career development grant awardees. BMJ Open, 9(5), e027928. Retrieved from http://bmjopen.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027928

Wilson, D. J. (2019). Predatory journals: A warning for us all. Medical Teacher, 0(0), 1–1. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2019.1593953

Wiratningsih, R. (2018). Library clinic services in avoiding transaction in the predatory journal. Library Management, 39(1/2), 21–30. Retrieved from http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/LM-02-2017-0023

Xia, J. (2015). Predatory journals and their article publishing charges. Learned Publishing, 28(1), 69–74. Retrieved from http://openurl.ingenta.com/content/xref?genre=article&issn=0953-1513&volume=28&issue=1&spage=69

Xia, J. (2019a). A Preliminary Study of Alternative Open Access Journal Indexes. Publishing Research Quarterly, (0123456789). Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12109-019-09642-y

Xia, J. (2019b). Economic Modelling of Predatory Journal Publishing. Publishing Research Quarterly, 35(3), 377–390. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-019-09661-9

Xia, J., Harmon, J. L., Connolly, K. G., Donnelly, R. M., Anderson, M. R., & Howard, H. A. (2015). Who publishes in “predatory” journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1406–1417. Retrieved from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/asi.23265

Xia, J., Li, Y., & Situ, P. (2017). An Overview of Predatory Journal Publishing in Asia. Journal of East Asian Libraries, (165). Retrieved from https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/jeal/vol2017/iss165/4

Yadav, S. (2018). Inside India’s fake research paper shops: pay, publish, profit | The Indian Express. The Indian Express, 1–17. Retrieved from https://indianexpress.com/article/india/inside-indias-fake-research-paper-shops-pay-publish-profit-5265402/

Yeates, S. (2017). After Beall’s ‘List of predatory publishers’’: problems with the list and paths forward.’ Information Research, 22(4), 1–6. Retrieved from http://www.informationr.net/ir/22-4/rails/rails1611.html

Yeoh, M., Cazan, A., Zaib, S., Muss, W., & Jacic, L. (2017). Ethical and Predatory Publishing: Experiences and Perceptions of Researcher. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov. Series VII: Social Sciences. Law, 10(2), 55–66. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321875076_Ethical_and_predatory_publishing_Experiences_and_perceptions_of_researchers

Zhao, L. (2014). Riding the Wave of Open Access: Providing Library Research Support for Scholarly Publishing Literacy. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 45(1), 3–18. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00048623.2014.882873